Unintended Consequences of Not Being Able to Define “What is a Woman?”
An unintended consequence of not being able to define a man or woman is you have defined away self-identification in the name of self-identification.
And that would include homosexuality. A person cannot be attracted to a person of the same sex if the other person identifies as the opposite gender. So if a woman is attracted to a woman who identifies as a man, then the lesbian is heterosexual by definition. She is attracted to a female who is not a woman but is a man who is not a male.
If you think this is all being made up, consider this – Norwegian law enforcement reportedly questioned a “radical feminist” (her words) over tweets challenging a trans activist for pushing the idea that biological males can be lesbians.
If a biological male can be a lesbian, then neither lesbians nor homosexuals exist. Trans-activists have defined that identity into a “dead-name”.
Another unintended consequence is hate speech becomes an invalid claim. If one person cannot impose a biological rarity onto another, then that would preclude imposing any reality onto another, then that includes imposing one person’s motivations onto another. How can someone say another is guilty of hate speech if we are not allowed to deny whatever is in another person’s mind as their reality?
When truth no longer exists as an objective reality, then reality becomes unidentifiable and undefinable.
Comments