Biblical Model or Business Model?
A Business Model or a Biblical Model?
How should congregations view their working relationship with ministers of the gospel?
Should preachers be an employee of a local congregation? Does anyone think Timothy or Titus were employees in Ephesus or Crete? The Biblical concept is fellowship (Philippians 4:15). Receiving support does not make a preacher an employee. If that was true, then when a preacher receives support from several congregations then he is an employee of each group. And that would make elders in one congregation in charge of a preacher in another congregation.
Should preachers sign contracts with congregations? Jesus said, “But let your ‘yes’ mean ‘yes,’ and your ‘no’ mean ‘no” (Matthew 5:37). If a signature is more binding than a preacher’s word, then is he really trustworthy? Why would you trust a man to preach the pure gospel but don’t trust him to be pure in keeping his word? Plus, what good is a contract? Would a church or preacher sue the other for breach of contract contrary to 1 Corinthians 6:1-8)?
There is a difference between the business model and the biblical model. One is based upon human wisdom, while the other is based upon God’s revealed wisdom



Perrydox.com is devoted to the pursuit of truth, whether plain or paradoxical, whether simple or sublime, or simply absurd yet absolute.

Comments